Newscripts
Sep 2nd, 2010Fragrance Overload?
[caption id="attachment_7452" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="Credit: Pascal Blachier via Wiki commons"][/caption] When humanity’s predilection for perfume meddles with the sense of smell of insects and animals, it can sometimes be fortuitous. Case in point: the discovery that Calvin Klein's Obsession perfume lures jaguars, tigers, and other big cats to expectant nature photographers and videographers. But meddling with odor receptors of other creatures can prove problematic. For example, the cosmetic and food fragrance 1-methylbutyl 3-methylbutanoate elicits aggressive defense behaviour in Continue reading →
By Sarah Everts • no commentsThe Haystack
Sep 2nd, 2010Orexigen Partners With Takeda for Potential Obesity Drug Contrave
This morning Orexigen Therapeutics became the second of the three leaders in the obesity drug race to partner with a larger company. They've successfully courted Takeda, which now gets exclusive marketing rights to obesity drug Contrave in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, if the drug gets regulatory approval. Orexigen's shares soared on the news, first released in the pre-dawn hours this morning. In the deal, Orexigen gets $50 million upfront from Takeda and could nab Continue reading →
By Carmen Drahl • 3 commentsThe Chemical Notebook
Sep 2nd, 2010Industrial Gas Companies Face Brazilian Fine Muito Grande
The Brazilian antitrust authority, Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), is levying fines totaling about $1.7 billion against Air Liquide, Air Products, Linde, Praxair’s Brazilian subsidiary White Martins. It has also implicated seven managers of those companies. CADE says it found evidence, through wire taps and searches, of an elaborate arrangement to divvy up the market by assigning customers to particular industrial gas companies. “CADE understands the actions of those companies that were investigated resulted Continue reading →
By Alex Tullo • 5 commentsCleantech Chemistry
Sep 2nd, 2010An Early Harvest of Biofuels News
Here it is, the second day of September, and I've got a small pile of releases here about goings-on in the biofuels industry. Venture Capital maven and biofuels booster Vinod Khosla's Khosla Ventures is backing the first three companies in this roundup. [caption id="attachment_240" align="alignleft" width="150" caption="Renewable Crude by KiOR, Credit: KiOR"][/caption] First I need to go back in time a little bit (to Aug. 17) and commend Range Fuels on getting its commerical cellulosic Continue reading →
By Melody Voith • 3 commentsTerra Sigillata
Sep 1st, 2010Physical exhaustion and scientific creativity
I've just received the print version of The Chronicle of Higher Education and just have to share this with those of you who read our weekend post about being tormented by lab directors who aren't keen on non-science activities. In this front page article, "Running Jogs the Academic Mind," by Don Troop, several academicians hold forth on the value of physical activity, running in particular, as a means to trigger thinking about research problems. Religious Continue reading →
By David Kroll • 10 commentsThe Safety Zone
Sep 1st, 2010Lab horror stories
Care to share your favorite lab accident? There's a call out over at the chemistry reddit for your lab horror stories. An example: Two postdocs were working in the glovebox next to me. They spilled some MeLi and were mopping it up with kimwipes. They knew it would be dangerous when they pulled it out of the antechamber, so they prepared an EtOH bath (which, to be fair would safely neutralize a small amount of Continue reading →
By Jyllian Kemsley • one commentJust Another Electron Pusher
Aug 30th, 2010Profile: …cartoonist?
The guy that I’m profiling for the blog today isn’t a chemist. At all. But he’s Jorge Cham, so does it matter? In case you’ve been living under something inorganic and heavy (or not a grad student), Cham is the creator of Piled Higher & Deeper, a comic strip about the...uniqueness... of graduate student life. He gave his “Power of Procrastination” talk at ACS last week, and I managed to drag him into a quiet Continue reading →
By Leigh Krietsch Boerner • no comments
The Safety Zone
» About This BlogLab horror stories
Care to share your favorite lab accident? There’s a call out over at the chemistry reddit for your lab horror stories. An example:
Two postdocs were working in the glovebox next to me. They spilled some MeLi and were mopping it up with kimwipes. They knew it would be dangerous when they pulled it out of the antechamber, so they prepared an EtOH bath (which, to be fair would safely neutralize a small amount of MeLi, iPrOH would have been better). One postdoc opens the antechamber and, as quickly as possible, took the kimwipes out and dunked them in the EtOH bath, only problem was, the kimwipes burst into flames as soon as the kimwipes were exposed to air, setting the bath on fire. In the panic, one of the postdocs went to get MORE ETOH and poured it on the fire. The bath overflowed, she started yelling for liquid nitrogen, I got out of my box and started running towards the liquid nitrogen. The next thing I know, i hear screaming, the postdoc walks out of the lab (right under a safety shower, without pulling the water release) with her entire pantleg on fire. I cant find LN2 so I take off her labcoat and snuff out the fire on her leg. The other postdoc managed to put out the EtOH fire, but he didnt remember how he did it. They both went to the hospital, one of them stayed for 2 weeks. That was my first summer in a lab, right before sophomore year.
Teaching safety to chemical engineers
Three years ago, the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) revamped a long-standing chemical safety program to make it more accessible to students–and now seems to be seeing greater use of the material in classrooms.
For nearly two decades, AIChE’s Center for Chemical Process Safety has been producing 4 to 6 safety modules a year that professors can use as teaching supplements. Part of the Safety and Chemical Engineering Education (SaChE) program, the modules cover broad topics such as runaway reactions and risk assessment, as well as more specific issues such as dust explosion control. Universities paid dues to SaChE for access to the modules.
Starting in 2008, AIChE revamped the program to make it more useful and accessible to students. As part of an effort to provide more benefits to student members, the organization started creating two modules a year that students can access independently and directly online, says Lowell M. Aplebaum, AIChE’s manager for member initiatives. Six modules are available to students now:
- Dust explosion control: Introduces background for understanding and preventing dust explosions.
- Inherently Safer Design: Provides information for understanding inherently safer design of chemical processes and plants.
- Safety in the Process Industries: Introduces the application of chemical process safety technology in an actual chemical facility.
- Risk Assessment: Provides an overview of the methods used for risk assessment, management, and reduction with examples and exercises.
- Runaway Reactions: Demonstrate the potential hazards and methods for controlling runaway reactions.
- Chemical Reactivity Hazards: Provides an overview of the basic understanding of chemical reactivity hazards.
Two more will be added this fall. The modules are freely available to student AIChE members (American and Canadian student members also benefit from a corporate sponsorship program that covers their dues). The modules are also freely available to universities with AIChE student chapters.
The modules take up to 6-7 hours to complete and students can start and stop at their convenience. They incorporate video demonstrations, often in an industrial setting, as well as some reading material. If students make it through an entire module and pass a quiz at the end, they get a certificate. In the last academic year AIChE issued nearly 2000 certificates, Aplebaum says. And “the more certificates students earn, the more they’re asking when more modules will be out,” he adds, noting that students are adding certificate information to their resumes.
It’s not just students that have taken notice of the new modules. Professors are starting to add them to courses as out-of-class assignments, with the quiz scores serving as extra credit or even part of a grade.
Laura Ford, a chemical engineering professor at the University of Tulsa, has made two of the modules a required part of the senior labs she teachers in her department. In the fall, the students do experiments mostly with water and air, measuring the performance of pumps or determining friction factors of different pipes. That semester, the students have to complete the module on safety in chemical process industries.
The spring semester lab involves experiments with 10-ft tall distillation columns. For that class, Ford requires students to complete the module on reactivity hazards.
As for the benefit of the modules, “Sometimes the students hear stuff from us but don’t think it’s important because we’re academics,” Ford says. “They think that industry has a different set of priorities.” Seeing engineers discuss safety issues in their industrial environment helps to cement that safety is important, she says.
David Rockstraw, a chemical engineering professor at New Mexico State University, has been using the modules in his classes for the last two years. The quality of the modules is high enough, he says, that he no longer covers some concepts in class and has the students do the modules instead. “There’s so much material to cover that you can’t possibly do it all,” he says, and adding the modules as assignments has freed up a little lecture time to get to topics he couldn’t previously. Rockstraw includes module material on his exams and gives students additional points for the quiz scores.
Rockstraw’s experience using the modules has been so positive, in fact, that his department has decided to require students to complete all of them before graduation. Some students do complain about the out-of-class burden, Rockstraw says, but the sense of accomplishment at getting the certificates outweighs at least a bit of that. Also, students have reported back that the modules helped them feel more prepared for job interviews.
Rockstraw echoes Ford’s feelings that the modules get some points across more effectively than he can in a classroom. “I can draw a sketch or show them a photograph, but when you’ve got a video of someone standing next to a reactor they work on at their company, it’s a lot more powerful,” Rockstraw says.
Friday round-up
To start the round-up today, I’d like to highlight a C&EN story from last year, Leather from another era, by my colleague Jean-François Tremblay. The story is about tanneries in Bangladesh and the hazards they present to workers and the environment. Jean-François just won an award from the American Society of Business Publication Editors for the piece. If you didn’t read it already, I’d say it’s definitely worth a few minutes to read it now. If you did read it before and are wondering whether the tanneries are actually relocating and improving, the answer seems to be not yet–Jean-François pointed me toward this Aug. 3 story from bdnews24.com, which says that the tanneries are still waiting for the Central Effluent Treatment Plant to be built.
That aside, it’s been a relatively quiet week for chemical health and safety news. Here are a few headlines:
- CSB issues final report on Xcel incident that killed five in a hydroelectric plant tunnel: “the causes of the accident included (1) a lack of planning and training for hazardous work by Xcel and its contractor, RPI Coating, Inc., (2) Xcel’s selection of RPI despite its having the lowest possible safety rating (zero) among competing contractors, and (3) allowing volatile flammable liquids to be introduced into a permit-required confined space without necessary special precautions”; CSB also released a letter to the company (pdf) regarding the company’s behavior during the investigation and a video on the dangers of confined spaces
- Illegal hazmat focus of Can-Am blitz: Interpol reports 85 hazmat-related violations identified during a recent coordinated enforcement effort in New York, Michigan, and Ontario.
- C&EN EPA to control surfactants, flame retardant, dyes
- In Australia, Firefighter maimed in a factory explosion sues over chemical blaze: “The factory, which had just passed a council safety inspection, did not have external HAZCHEM signs despite using potentially explosive chemicals.”
- Chemicals combine at Alabama garbage warehouse: muratic acid (muriatic acid?), calcium chloride, sodium hypochlorite, and calcium hydroxide
Leaks and spills: sulfuric acid (at a metal finishing company, discovered when a burglar alarm went off), ammonia (at a refrigeration plant, 29 people hospitalized), hydrochloric acid (at least 8,000 gal at a water treatment facility), mercury (“along a path that stretched up the basement stairs and outside the house”), chlorine (guessing this was pool chemicals), chlorine AND sulfuric acid, some sort of resin, a fungicide, liquid oxygen, diesel fuel (“a tractor trailer lost a tire, and shards from the tire apparently ruptured the truck’s diesel 125 gallon fuel tank”), and sulfur dioxide (from an old refrigerator).
CSB chairman speaks at ACS meeting
U.S. Chemical Safety & Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) Chairman Rafael Moure-Eraso spoke at the ACS National Meeting in Boston this afternoon, in the Presidential Event on Laboratory Safety. C&EN Senior Correspondent Cheryl Hogue attended the talk and tweeted from it. We weren’t organized enough to get the live-tweeting thing set up a la The Haystack, so I’ve manually copied the tweets here for your reading pleasure:
- #Chemical explosions due to active (equipment or human) & latent (like lack of training) errors says #Chemsafety Board Chairman
- #Chemsafety Board Chairman recorded 1 academic lab fatality, 96 injuries, 97 evacuations since 2001
- Injured grad student #TexasTech lab explosion wore no goggles, lab coat, blast/face shield says #Chemsafety Board chairman
- Latent errors, such as lack of training “pretty glaring” at US academic #chemistry labs says #Chemsafety board Chairman
- Universities in developing countries struggle to institute #chemsafety. US has problems too: #Chemsafety Board chairman
- OSHA needs to revisit decision to exempt student lab researchers from safety regulations: #Chemsafety Board chairman
Did anyone attend the talk on the update to Prudent Practices in the Laboratory?
Policing potentially dangerous students
ChemBark and ChemJobber both have posts up this morning commenting on the Texas Tech incident. I’d like to jump off from something in the ChemBark post:
I bet anyone who’s worked in a lab has encountered at least one coworker whose inattention to safety has troubled those in his presence. I feel a little bad for the PI here, because she is ultimately responsible for what goes on in her lab, and it seems as though this student was incredibly irresponsible. Nevertheless, it doesn’t sound like she was the best at oversight, as Brown had an established pattern of dangerous behavior and didn’t exactly hide it. When you’re in charge of a lab, it is not enough to establish protocols and dictate your wishes. You must ensure that your protocols are being executed properly. If your directions are repeatedly ignored, you’ve got to swallow hard and take care of the nasty business of booting a student from the lab.
When I asked a couple of professors about this issue two years ago (for Making Explosives in the Lab), two said that they had, in fact, booted students from the lab:
Both Klapötke and DesMarteau have refused to work with students who may be a safety hazard. Klapötke declined to let a student advance to Ph.D.-level work after the student repeatedly scaled up syntheses without permission. DesMarteau asked a student to leave after the student let their spouse use the group’s vacuum line to pump off an organic solvent, and the next day the residue caused another student’s compound to explode. No one was hurt, but “sometimes people do something stupid and you can’t take the risk that they will do it again,” DesMarteau says.
Another professor I spoke with more recently said that he had had a student he was concerned about, and so the professor hovered–he checked up on the student frequently, making sure the student stuck to the established protocols.
Anyone else have experience with the issue of having to monitor a potentially dangerous student or employee? How can this be done appropriately and effectively? I suspect this is an area in which few, if any, prospective or newly-appointed faculty are effectively mentored. The danger, of course, is not just to the student in question–labmates could get hurt or, in the Texas Tech case, others on campus or at the student’s home.
‘Talking about safety is something that scientists do’ (or, at least, should)
My story looking into the details of the January incident at Texas Tech University is out today: Texas Tech Lessons. In short, a graduate student made way too much of an extremely hazardous material, didn’t use protective equipment, and got badly hurt when the substance blew up in his hands. The incident is prompting changes in safety programs not just at TTU but also in research centers funded by the Department of Homeland Security.
The person about to be in charge of all environmental health and safety (EH&S) matters at Texas Tech is Alice Young, TTU’s faculty fellow for research integrity, a position that falls under the office of the vice president for research. She is also a professor of psychology and of pharmacology and neuroscience.
As faculty fellow for research integrity, Young’s responsibilities include oversight of TTU’s institutional review board for research on human subjects, animal care and use, research integrity, and research misconduct. She is also in charge of the university’s responsible conduct of research programs, which are now required for all students and postdocs funded by National Science Foundation grants, as well as some National Institutes of Health-funded researchers.
Previously, TTU’s EH&S department had been considered part of facilities. “We are fully convinced that the only way to have a proper safety culture on campus is to have EH&S and all that it does be more fully integrated into the academic and research environment on campus,” says T. Taylor Eighmy, TTU’s vice president for research. “We believe it will have more prominence with faculty and students when it’s affiliated with this office.”
Friday round-up
Chemical health & safety news from the past week:
- From the blogosphere: OSHA at forty: New strategies for old challenges, Can OSHA ban a dangerous work practice?, and Some thoughts on online training courses
- OSHA is also seeking input on which chemicals the agency should target for new or updated permissible exposure limits
- From C&EN: A better way to measure chemical risks (look at biotransformation rather than hydrophobicity) and Recasting TSCA
- NSF International and the National School Supply and Equipment Association collaborate to develop a national standard for K-12 school equipment: ”to certify health, safety and environmental aspects of products and eequipment used in the educational environment,” including lab equipment
- Inquest into a 2002 explosion that killed a member of a British-American team investigating home-made bombs: Jupp inquest hears of ’no lab tests’ of fatal explosive and blast mixture ‘not authorized’
- UConn physics professor Juha Javanainen let son make bombs: ”He specifically warned his son not to manufacture acetone peroxide because it is very unstable, he told police. Nevertheless, he caught the boy cooling the ingredients to make acetone peroxide in a downstairs refrigerator. That fact that Javanainen failed to monitor his son’s experiments after that discovery is one of the reasons he was arrested, the warrant states.”
- 10 gallons of hydrogen peroxide shut down several blocks of New York’s Times Square
- Chemical spill preempted fire that killed employee at Quad/Graphics in Tennessee: “While working with a forklift inside the factory Friday, Mitchell had punctured a line containing toluene, a flammable chemical used in the printing process, said Dickson Fire Chief Richard Greer. The chemical had spilled onto his body, but he was able to climb a flight of stairs and shut off a secondary valve, preventing a potentially huge chemical leak at the factory, the chief said. … Mitchell then drove the forklift to the shower room to remove the chemical from his body, but in doing so, a spark ignited the flammable liquid, and burned him on more than 98 percent of his body.”)
- Fire at Tronox chemical plant in Hamilton, Miss. in the sodium chlorate storage facility
- Two 18-wheelers tangled and shut down a stretch of the Gulf Freeway for hours, but no one injured: ”One vehicle, a Fed Ex truck, was hauling two trailers and carrying both a powdery marine pollutant and a liquid pesticide. The other vehicle contained plastic food service trays, officials said. Both trucks caught fire. The flames reignited around 10:30 a.m., authorities said, prompting both sides of the freeway to be closed. … Crews from at least two environmental services companies were called in. The effort entailed sopping up contaminated dousing water with absorbent material and vacuuming some excess liquid and other debris, DuPont said.”
- In Australia, Students, teachers hospitalised after science experiment mishap involving magnesium powder
On the “household” chemical front:
- In the U.K., Children treated after Twickenham school chemical leak after someone poured 100 L of sodium hypochlorite and sodium bisulfate down a drain
- Chlorine explosions prompt safety concerns (there are a few of these incidents in the news EVERY WEEK–let’s all pay attention to Charlotte, N.C. Fire Department Battalion Chief Phil Bosche, shall we? “If you put the wrong chemical in the wrong environment in the wrong place, a lot of things can happen and an explosion is entirely possible”)
Leaks and spills: anhydrous ammonia, hydrochloric acid, muriatic acid, brake fluid and ink (from a FedEx truck–for some reason someone initially thought it was HCl), formaldehyde, more formaldehyde, chlorine (that shut down nine buildings at Caltech), methacryolyl chloride (which led to a building evacuation at Tufts), xylene hydroxchloride, more ammonia, agricultural lime (plus some diesel fuel), an unidentified pesticide, even more hydrochloric acid, a mile-long trail of fertilizer, “a corrosive liquid known as UN1760″ (that would be the Department of Transportation number for “Corrosive liquids, not otherwise specified”), and unspecified flammable liquids.
Yes, that is the sixth and final word up there in the photo. If you can’t see the photo, the word is “CENtral.” If you don’t know what I’m talking about, look here. If you’re going to Boston, enjoy the meeting!
Battle of the videos: Handling pyrophoric reagents
Whoops, sorry folks. Not sure what happened there–the post was fine when it first went up, then was gone the next time I checked the blog.
Let’s have a little video contest, shall we? I’m aware of three videos for handling of pyrophoric materials: One each from the University of California Los Angeles and San Diego campuses, plus another from Yale University. The poll below will allow you to vote on your favorite. Comments are open if you’d like to explain your choice!
Sorry, links only, since 2/3 videos won’t allow me to embed:
Which pyrophoric-handling video do you like best?
Friday round-up
Chemical health and safety news from the past week:
- Not chemical but possibly useful to our audience: Got a green laser pointer? Make sure it has an infrared filter.
- C&EN OSHA slaps BP with $50.6 million for safety violations at the company’s Texas City, Texas, refinery
- C&EN EPA proposes rule to require chemical makers to provide data about production, processing, and use of their compounds every four years, substantiate claims that data submitted to EPA be protected as confidential business information
- EPA enters debate over toxic strawberry fumigant methyl iodide
- FAA proposes hazmat civil penalties against 12 companies: “the companies allegedly offered the hazardous material for transportation (or, in the cases of UPS and Federal Express, accepted it) when it was not packaged, marked, classed, described, labeled or in condition for shipment as required by regulations”
- University of Iowa physics and astronomy instructor burned by an explosion involving balloons filled with hydrogen and oxygen
- On the J&J Chemical fire in Georgia listed last week: Response to fire and chemical spill fell short, most agree
- Texas scrap yard worker cuts into cylinder, gets exposed to anhydrous ammonia–who disposed of the cylinder?
- In Ohio, Chemicals ignite in United Initiators’ wastewater skimming pond; the company makes organic peroxides (“You could smell the burning toxins,” said a worker from a nearby facility)
- Static electricity may have sparked Americhem chemical plant fire in Michigan; the company president thinks that a tanker that entered the company’s weighing facility around 3 p.m. Friday containing 500 gallons of mineral spirits exploded for some other reason; Sheriff’s officials credit unspecified safety measures for the fact that no one was hurt
- Hot weather led to methyl methacrylate spill at Wichita, Kan. plant–the chemical likely expanded due to warm weather and burst out of its barrel
- In Fresno, Calif., a 2,000 gallon hydrogen peroxide tank stared venting gas at the Univar USA plant, likely because of weather (“The plant has been shut down for the day, as firefighters continue to spray the tank in hopes of cooling it down. A 2,000 ft evacuation zone around the plant has been put into place.”)
Household
- Man, granddaughter hurt when pool chemicals explode after the grandfather mixed together two different chlorine products with different ingredients
International
- Australia: Workers at a uranium mine were exposed to ammonia fumes and kerosene-contaminated water
- India: In Bangalore, a fire at a company that manufactures melamine wood finish and thinners, possibly illegally located “in the middle of a busy commercial area”
- U.K.: In Sheffield, a hydrochloric acid leak at a wire manufacturer; in Tockwith, a fire at waste management company BCB Environmental Management
Student background checks
A piece yesterday in The Chronicle of Higher Education, U. of Virginia abandons proposed student background checks in favor of stricter self-disclosure (subscription required), reminded me of a story I worked on a couple of years ago about then-University of California, Merced, graduate student Jason D. West. West pled guilty to stealing approximately $10,000 worth of equipment and chemicals from the university in an effort to make methamphetamine (Student suspected of making meth, Student accused of making meth agrees to plea deal, Student sentenced for making meth).
While I can see the problems involved with trying to run background checks on entire student bodies, is there an argument to be made that it would be worthwhile to run checks on undergraduate or graduate chemistry researchers? Both West and another chemistry student who was convicted of using university resources to synthesize drugs, former San Diego State University student Matthew H. Finley, had previous drug-related convictions. And aside from illegal drugs synthesis, I can see there being concerns about other areas of chemistry, such as working with energetic materials. (No, this is not an issue that has come up regarding the Texas Tech incident, I just have explosives on my mind this week.)
At the time I reported on West, I found only one school–the University of Texas, Austin–that ran background checks on graduate students. “The university mandated them for staff and faculty, and we decided to extend it to grad student employees,” John Baxendale, administrative manager for UT Austin’s chemistry department, told me at the time. “We basically began doing them just because we thought it was a good practice.” The department was not using the checks for admissions but the results could prevent a student from being appointed to a teaching or research assistant position, Baxendale said.
What say you, readers? Do you think background checks of student chemistry researchers are a good or bad idea? Do you know of any other schools who are now doing them?


Recent Comments