Water, Water

The Big Thirst: The Secret Life and Turbulent Future of WaterIt’s become something of a truism that water scarcity will be as important an issue worldwide in the 21st century as finding alternatives to fossil fuels. A new book, “The Big Thirst: The Secret Life and Turbulent Future of Water” by Charles Fishman, convincingly drives that point home with a plethora of data on water use and interviews with people on the front lines of providing water for uses ranging from agriculture to advanced computer chip manufacturing to human consumption. One of the central themes that Fishman develops and documents in “The Big Thirst” is that humans’ relationship to water is extraordinarily unrealistic. In developed nations, that’s largely because in everyone’s living memory water has always been abundant and cheap. The marketplace does not put any kind of realistic value on clean water, so people pay little or no attention to how they use it. Until it’s not there. Additionally, most people know almost nothing about the chemistry of water or water purification. Fishman writes: “Although we don’t often notice it, every gallon of water we use has an economic value—the value of whatever we can actually do with that water. … In fact, we typically behave … as if the opposite were true: We act as if clean, on-demand water had zero economic value. Especially in the developed world, the economic value inherent in the water is hidden under a cloak of invisibility, because although the water has indispensable usefulness, it rarely has a price.” Chapter 6 of “The Big Thirst” is titled “The Yuck Factor” and details the water travails of Toowoomba, a city of 120,000 in Queensland, Australia. Toowoomba sits atop a range of low mountains and has no access to a water supply such as a river or lake. It is entirely dependent for its water on rainfall filling three city reservoirs. Toowoomba’s problem is that, for the past decade, there hasn’t been any appreciable rain, and its reservoirs are now 90% empty. A 2005 plan to solve Toowoomba’s water crisis by recycling the city’s wastewater using proven technology sparked an acrimonious debate that led to a referendum in which the plan to recycle wastewater was defeated by a 2-1 margin, Fishman writes. The “yuck factor” of drinking treated sewage was just too much to overcome. Having just finished “The Big Thirst,” I was amused by a small item in the June 21 New York Times headlined “Oregon: Millions of Gallons of Water Disposed Of.” The item reads, in part, “Portland is disposing of eight million gallons of drinking water because a man was caught on camera urinating in a reservoir. Water from the city’s five open-air reservoirs goes directly to customers. A city official said he did not want to serve water with urine in it.” Wow! I thought. There’s the yuck factor run amok. Not to mention a certain level of scientific ignorance. Urine is 95% water. According to a NASA report I quickly found through Wikipedia, the two components of urine that are generally present at one or more grams per liter are urea (9.3–23.3 g/L) and sodium chloride (3.0–12.8 g/L). Other common constituents are potassium, creatinine, inorganic sulfur, and phosphorus. Hardly a witches’ brew. And pretty well diluted. Fishman is a font of fascinating information on a wide range of watery topics. On bottled water, for example, he informs us that Americans spent $21 billion in 2009 on 8.4 billion gal of bottled water. U.S. water systems leak about 7 billion gal of water a day, he notes, “so the water pipes supplying our homes leak more drinking water in thirty hours than we buy at stores in a year.” Meanwhile, he points out, “we spend about $29 billion a year maintaining our entire water system in the United States—the drinking water treatment plants, the pump stations, the pipes in the ground, the wastewater treatment plants.” Fishman is actually an optimist who, despite our history of mismanaging water, believes that “water problems are eminently solvable.” Nevertheless, “The Big Thirst” provides a sobering evaluation of our relationship to one of the most vital substances on Earth. Thanks for reading.

Author: Rudy Baum

Share This Post On

1 Comment

  1. I agree that Fishman’s book raises important issues about our relationship to water. I think that it is true that most people are largely unaware of the details of where their water comes from, and also, where it goes after they “use” it.

    I live on the eastern Colorado Plains, near the foot of the Rocky Mountains, (we call it the “Front Range”). My drinking water actually originates in the headwaters of the Colorado River, on the Western slope of the Rockies. It is diverted here via reservoirs, pumping, and a tunnel under the continental divide and Rocky Mountain National Park. See: http://www.ncwcd.org/project_features/cbt_main.asp. The city of Denver has a similar system.

    After my neighbors and I am through with it, that water may flow all the way to the mouth of the Mississippi. So the process proposed for Toowoomba is largely what is happening, we just prefer not to think about it that way. The wastewater treatments and subsequent drinking water purification are generally structured as if they were separate, isolated processes.

    Some Processes are more direct, such as this linkage of the city of Denver and the growing suburb to the east, Aurora:

    Binny Water Purification Plant, Aurora

    “The process begins downstream from where the Denver Metro Wastewater Reclamation District sends water into the South Platte River. The water filters through riverbank sand and gravel to Aurora’s alluvial wells a short distance from the river. That three- to seven-day process naturally removes pharmaceuticals, a growing concern of regulatory agencies and water utilities. Underground reservoirs hold the water for up to 30 days more, further cleaning it.

    The water is then piped 34 miles to the Binney plant, where it is softened and sent through 12 UV reactors, the largest UV installation in the United States, mixed with hydrogen peroxide and filtered through activated carbon. From there it moves to Aurora’s storage reservoir for drinking water, where it blends for a second time (the first being when water Denver’s facility mixes with South Platte River water).”

    Quote from: http://www.americanwaterintel.com/archive/1/11/general/innovative-colorado-plant-beats-budget-100m.html
    (this seems to allow one time access)

    or see this alternative: http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_16293590