19
Britt Erickson
Cadmium In The Trash
19
Posted by Britt Erickson on January 19, 2010 in Chemistry in the News
Parents across America are throwing out their kids’ inexpensive costume jewelry because they fear it might contain cadmium.
When the Consumer Product Safety Commission set lower limits on the amount of lead allowed in U.S. toys, some Chinese manufacturers apparently began using cadmium instead. Cadmium is cheap, but it’s also toxic.
According to the Occupational Safety & Health Administration, cadmium is “a soft, blue-white malleable, lustrous metal or a grayish-white powder that is insoluble in water and reacts readily with dilute nitric acid.” Cadmium metal is primarily used because of its anticorrosive properties. It is found in alkaline batteries, pigments, metal coatings, plastics, and now some children’s toys imported from China.
Cadmium is considered a known human carcinogen by the Department of Health & Human Services. Long-term exposure to the metal can lead to kidney disease, lung damage, and fragile bones, depending on the route of exposure.
The question is whether a child is likely to be exposed to cadmium in toys. Wearing a necklace or bracelet is unlikely to cause harm, but sucking on a necklace, or swallowing a piece of it, would certainly be a different story.
In October, bright orange pumpkin erasers with extremely high levels (1800 ppm) of cadmium were in the news. I happened to have a few of them around my house from birthday party goody bags my kids brought home. Out of concern that my kids would chew on them, I threw the erasers out in the trash.
Someone ought to calculate how much cadmium is likely to enter landfills because of the recent cadmium jewelry scare, and what impact that could have on ground and surface waters.
Posted in Chemistry in the News | Post a Comment »
My Own Genome
11
Posted by Britt Erickson on June 11, 2008 in Chemistry is Everywhere
As I left the National Press Club yesterday afternoon, I thought, wow, maybe now’s the time. For only $1,000, I could buy my personal genome. I had just attended a briefing sponsored by the
I went into the discussion with basically no knowledge of the issues. I had no idea so many companies were selling personal genomes. Where have I been? Blame it on the kids, the long commute, the fact that I focused only on environmental issues for the past two years. I’m familiar with the technology used to sequence the human genome from my days working as a reporter for the news section of Analytical Chemistry, so it wasn’t completely uncharted territory. I even know what SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms, pronounced snips) are.
As I sat there listening to the panelists talk candidly around the lunch table, I just couldn’t believe how fast the world is changing. I’ve always thought of myself as one of the younger ones, but when I hear things like 20 year olds are sharing their personal genomes with each other on social networking sites, I start feeling old. I’ve never even used a social networking site.
Posted in Chemistry is Everywhere | 1 Comment »
Search
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Chemistry Blogs
- A Chemical Sabbatical
- ACS Division of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology
- ACS Press Blog
- Act4Chemistry.org
- blog.khymos.org
- Carbon-Based Curiosities
- chem-bla-ics
- Chemistry Blog
- Chemistry World Blog
- Chemjobber
- ChemSpider Blog
- Everyday Scientist
- In the Pipeline
- Lecturer Notes
- Periodic Tabloid
- The Chem Blog
- The Culture of Chemistry
- The Curious Wavefunction
- The Great Molecular Crapshoot
- The Sceptical Chymist
- Totally Synthetic
- unbalanced reaction
- Useful Chemistry
Recent Comments