arrow2 Comments
  1. John Spevacek
    Feb 25 - 2:59 pm

    I loved the post. For most people, the idea of “forgery in photograph” would be that it was photoshopped.

    I don think the investigators are working with a dicey proposition here. Certainly it is possible to rule out new paper from old, but the whole idea that a photographer was always loyal to a particular paper source is too big an assumption in my mind. And to make million dollar decisions based on that idea alone? It’s not as if boxes of paper are never mislabeled or rebranded by shady shopkeepers or…There are too many ways for that assumption to be unknowingly wrong.

  2. Neil Gussman
    Feb 25 - 6:48 pm

    Wow–So interesting that eBay would be the place to help. Our archivist troll eBay for chemistry sets and many other artifacts. Very interesting about the different photo papers.

Mobile Theme