arrow2 Comments
  1. Rick Mullin
    Mar 29 - 5:59 pm

    Glad you brought attention to this. Sheer madness. What would da Vinci think of scientists doing this to art? Such experiments illustrate a complete lack of any regard for, or understanding of the purpose of, art. This is no different than Patricia Cromwell destroying a painting by Walter Sickert to prove that Sickert was Jack the Ripper. Not only was an important painting destroyed, but a guy who should be know as a great painter is now mostly known to the person on the street as Jack the Ripper(suffice it to say, Walter Sickert was not Jack the Ripper).

    Item 2: Why perform any experiment to see if the Vasari painting is done on top of a da Vinci, especially when you have no regard for or understanding of the purpose of art?

  2. Dream
    Jul 26 - 6:56 pm

    I think stop reading the hype and leave the painting alone.

Mobile Theme