<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innovation: We Know It When We See It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cenblog.org/2009/06/25/innovation-we-know-it-when-we-see-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cenblog.org/2009/06/25/innovation-we-know-it-when-we-see-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:45:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich Apodaca</title>
		<link>http://cenblog.org/2009/06/25/innovation-we-know-it-when-we-see-it/comment-page-1/#comment-26939</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Apodaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cenblog.org/?p=1143#comment-26939</guid>
		<description>&quot;You&#039;ll know you&#039;re being innovative if you feel uncomfortable.&quot;

That&#039;s the best advice on the subject of innovation I ever got. It came from a talk given at an innovation symposium held by a company at which I did a summer internship. Most speakers said something along the lines of &quot;think outside the box&quot;, which when you really think about it is nothing more than useless tautology.

But one scientist offered the advice above. Now that&#039;s useful.

It&#039;s easy to lose sight of the fact that every single product we think of today as being innovative started out as a piece of junk almost nobody cared about. Stuff that &#039;experts&#039; in the field said could never work. Stuff that no serious person (or company) would ever waste time or money with.

The iPod entered a market with several of other digital music players and was not expected by most tech observers to do very well. Netflix is an innovative service - but if so, why didn&#039;t Blockbuster develop it instead? In both cases it&#039;s a mistake to confuse what now exists with what existed when the respective products were launched.

Now, just because you feel uncomfortable doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;re being innovative. You could be doing something merely stupid or criminal instead.

But if what you&#039;re now working on is widely-regarded as the &#039;correct&#039; approach, you&#039;ve either made it through the period of being uncomfortable with your innovative idea and others are starting to come around (congratulations!), or you&#039;re not being very innovative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You&#8217;ll know you&#8217;re being innovative if you feel uncomfortable.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the best advice on the subject of innovation I ever got. It came from a talk given at an innovation symposium held by a company at which I did a summer internship. Most speakers said something along the lines of &#8220;think outside the box&#8221;, which when you really think about it is nothing more than useless tautology.</p>
<p>But one scientist offered the advice above. Now that&#8217;s useful.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to lose sight of the fact that every single product we think of today as being innovative started out as a piece of junk almost nobody cared about. Stuff that &#8216;experts&#8217; in the field said could never work. Stuff that no serious person (or company) would ever waste time or money with.</p>
<p>The iPod entered a market with several of other digital music players and was not expected by most tech observers to do very well. Netflix is an innovative service &#8211; but if so, why didn&#8217;t Blockbuster develop it instead? In both cases it&#8217;s a mistake to confuse what now exists with what existed when the respective products were launched.</p>
<p>Now, just because you feel uncomfortable doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;re being innovative. You could be doing something merely stupid or criminal instead.</p>
<p>But if what you&#8217;re now working on is widely-regarded as the &#8216;correct&#8217; approach, you&#8217;ve either made it through the period of being uncomfortable with your innovative idea and others are starting to come around (congratulations!), or you&#8217;re not being very innovative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
