<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Chemistry Dictionary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cenblog.org/2008/12/19/digital-chemistry-dictionary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/12/19/digital-chemistry-dictionary/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:13:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Moore</title>
		<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/12/19/digital-chemistry-dictionary/comment-page-1/#comment-10469</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cenblog.org/2008/12/19/digital-chemistry-dictionary/#comment-10469</guid>
		<description>Ha!  That would be incredibly helpful!  You know we editors try to catch things like that, but sometimes we miss a proline here and there.  I mean, praline.  Which ones are the tastey ones?  Well, that&#039;s not what it&#039;s supposed to be, whichever it is.

FYI, C&amp;EN&#039;s text has been praline-free since pretty much forever (did a text search of the online archives), except for one Newscripts in July 2005 (and I do believe that was intentional!).  But when it&#039;s caught before it&#039;s printed, sometimes writers will send you boxes of pralines in the office.  Keep &#039;em comin&#039;, guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  That would be incredibly helpful!  You know we editors try to catch things like that, but sometimes we miss a proline here and there.  I mean, praline.  Which ones are the tastey ones?  Well, that&#8217;s not what it&#8217;s supposed to be, whichever it is.</p>
<p>FYI, C&amp;EN&#8217;s text has been praline-free since pretty much forever (did a text search of the online archives), except for one Newscripts in July 2005 (and I do believe that was intentional!).  But when it&#8217;s caught before it&#8217;s printed, sometimes writers will send you boxes of pralines in the office.  Keep &#8216;em comin&#8217;, guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChemSpiderMan</title>
		<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/12/19/digital-chemistry-dictionary/comment-page-1/#comment-8981</link>
		<dc:creator>ChemSpiderMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 04:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cenblog.org/2008/12/19/digital-chemistry-dictionary/#comment-8981</guid>
		<description>Adam has done a great job turning a very complex list of over 1.3 million identifiers from ChemSpider into a digestible format for word processors. A Great service to the chemistry community!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam has done a great job turning a very complex list of over 1.3 million identifiers from ChemSpider into a digestible format for word processors. A Great service to the chemistry community!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
