<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Many People Does It Take To Make A Buckyball?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:17:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cyndi lam</title>
		<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/comment-page-1/#comment-7227</link>
		<dc:creator>cyndi lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/#comment-7227</guid>
		<description>hello how do you make 60 pcs of triangle shape. Can you give me the measurement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello how do you make 60 pcs of triangle shape. Can you give me the measurement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard edison</title>
		<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/comment-page-1/#comment-1907</link>
		<dc:creator>richard edison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/#comment-1907</guid>
		<description>I can think of no greater affront to the ancient art of origami.~,:^0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can think of no greater affront to the ancient art of origami.~,:^0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Origami de um fulereno</title>
		<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/comment-page-1/#comment-1896</link>
		<dc:creator>Origami de um fulereno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/#comment-1896</guid>
		<description>[...] Via CENtral [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via CENtral [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/comment-page-1/#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>Oh definitely...in the same way that we have issues with turnips and swedes in the UK depending on whether one is in the north or the south. But, saying that although Brits call soccer football, we also call it soccer, so there would only be confusion if they&#039;d been called footballanes, because those Stateside would assume it was a point ovoid rather than a sphere.

Happy 4th July by the way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh definitely&#8230;in the same way that we have issues with turnips and swedes in the UK depending on whether one is in the north or the south. But, saying that although Brits call soccer football, we also call it soccer, so there would only be confusion if they&#8217;d been called footballanes, because those Stateside would assume it was a point ovoid rather than a sphere.</p>
<p>Happy 4th July by the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Rowe</title>
		<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/comment-page-1/#comment-1863</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/#comment-1863</guid>
		<description>Hurray! Video comes to the Chemical and Engineering News blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurray! Video comes to the Chemical and Engineering News blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen Drahl</title>
		<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/comment-page-1/#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen Drahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/#comment-1862</guid>
		<description>@Luis-You&#039;re right. a geodesic dome is more of an almost-sphere, though a geodesic sphere needn&#039;t have 60 vertices. Just look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceship_Earth_&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Spaceship Earth&lt;/a&gt; at Epcot Center in Disney World.
If we really want to get down to particulars, my understanding is that the first dome that could be called &quot;geodesic&quot; wasn&#039;t designed by Fuller. 

@David-I think [60]soccerane might have run into a bit of the football/futbol/soccer naming issues, personally....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Luis-You&#8217;re right. a geodesic dome is more of an almost-sphere, though a geodesic sphere needn&#8217;t have 60 vertices. Just look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceship_Earth_" rel="nofollow">Spaceship Earth</a> at Epcot Center in Disney World.<br />
If we really want to get down to particulars, my understanding is that the first dome that could be called &#8220;geodesic&#8221; wasn&#8217;t designed by Fuller. </p>
<p>@David-I think [60]soccerane might have run into a bit of the football/futbol/soccer naming issues, personally&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/comment-page-1/#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>When Kroto and colleagues were first trying to figure out what structure a molecule with just 60 carbon atoms might take, legend has it that it took a colleague in mathematics to point out that a truncated icosahedron had spherical symmetry and sixty vertices like a conventional hexagons and pentagons football (soccerball for US readers). Of course, Sir Harry himself likened the structure to one of the geodesic designs of Richard Buckminster Fuller and of course that name became fullerene/buckyball. It really ought to have been called [60]soccerane...just a thought.

The BBC documentary even tried to have the team piecing together hexagons and pentagons in the same way that Watson and Crick pieced together DNA, but I presume that was merely artistic license as once they knew it was soccerball shaped piecing it together would have been trivial.

Still a fantastic discovery that has given us chemistry writers metaphorical fodder for years now.

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Kroto and colleagues were first trying to figure out what structure a molecule with just 60 carbon atoms might take, legend has it that it took a colleague in mathematics to point out that a truncated icosahedron had spherical symmetry and sixty vertices like a conventional hexagons and pentagons football (soccerball for US readers). Of course, Sir Harry himself likened the structure to one of the geodesic designs of Richard Buckminster Fuller and of course that name became fullerene/buckyball. It really ought to have been called [60]soccerane&#8230;just a thought.</p>
<p>The BBC documentary even tried to have the team piecing together hexagons and pentagons in the same way that Watson and Crick pieced together DNA, but I presume that was merely artistic license as once they knew it was soccerball shaped piecing it together would have been trivial.</p>
<p>Still a fantastic discovery that has given us chemistry writers metaphorical fodder for years now.</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/comment-page-1/#comment-1853</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/#comment-1853</guid>
		<description>The nature paper is free at http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v318/n6042/pdf/318162a0.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nature paper is free at <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v318/n6042/pdf/318162a0.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v318/n6042/pdf/318162a0.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Brudna</title>
		<link>http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/comment-page-1/#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Brudna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cenblog.org/2008/07/02/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-make-a-buckyball/#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>The first video is the same structure as C60?! I guess that is different. 
---
C60: Buckminsterfullerene
    * Kroto, H. W., Heath, J. R., O&#039;Brien, S. C., Curl, R. F &amp; Smalley, R. E.
    * Nature 318, 162–163 (14 November 1985)
    * doi:10.1038/318162a0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first video is the same structure as C60?! I guess that is different.<br />
&#8212;<br />
C60: Buckminsterfullerene<br />
    * Kroto, H. W., Heath, J. R., O&#8217;Brien, S. C., Curl, R. F &amp; Smalley, R. E.<br />
    * Nature 318, 162–163 (14 November 1985)<br />
    * doi:10.1038/318162a0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
