Bush And The Environment

From this week's editorial:
What's with the Bush Administration and environmental regulation? What is it about President George W. Bush and his closest advisers that has led to an almost complete rejection of the 30-plus-year consensus in the U.S. that legislative and regulatory means are required to ensure a healthy environment for us and for future generations? I'm not talking here about efforts to prevent global climate change. We now know that President Bush's 2000 campaign promise to regulate greenhouse gases was as bogus as his claim to be a "uniter, not a divider." No, I'm talking about the more mundane, but still vitally important, control of mercury from coal-fired power plants, ozone in urban environments, air quality in national parks, and reporting toxic releases from industrial plants, to name just a few examples. In every one of these cases, and in many others, the Bush Administration has worked for seven years to undermine coherent regulation on these issues and the agencies, especially the Environmental Protection Agency, responsible for that regulation.
Read on, then share your thoughts here.

Author: Rachel Pepling

Share This Post On